After receiving such an encouraging welcome here I though I would post a WIP of my current project, Again its an Aircraft (RM797) that is currently being restored to airworthy condition here in Oz.
I have only done to basics thus far on both the front and rear, mostly concentrated on the mid section at this stage. Its all a little clean at the moment, wont remain that way for long tho.
I have just read the stencil thread below, and have been looking for a way to add stencils to this profile, does anybody have an appropriate resource they could point me to? I have one for a Vc but I am unsure if this would work her on the later model.
Much work still to be done.
GFR
Last edited by GiantFlyingRobots; 23rd November 2007 at 13:14.
This has a really nice feel about it, crisp and solid, but for me, the rivets and screws and even some panel line edges look way over stated.
This is just my personal views and can be taken with a pinch of salt.
Other than that the detail looks phenomenal, my kinda drawing, keep at it.
BTW I’d be very interested in the reference material for this AC as I need to do a few more Spits for Phoenix.
Posts: 681
Thanks: 17
Thanked 13 Times in 12 Posts
Downloads: 5
Uploads: 2
Rep Power: 2
Re: Spitfire MK XIV e WIP
I agree about the panel lines and rivets: you might want to make them more discreet. They are not particularly visible on an aircraft usually, and are mostly "guessed" by the eye because of light reflections/dirt/paint chipping. A combinaison of these things should make them obvious enough but not overpowering.
I'd also suggest reinforcing the definition of shapes (Blowhard might go for you if you don't, lol).
Aside from that, it's very nice. Keep us posted on your progress if you will.
As for stencils, have you tried the AJ-Press monography n°5 (Mk IX-XVI) or the Aero Detail n°27 (Mk VI-XVI). Also Pod Lupa n°3 (VII, IX, XVI) has some detailled pics. PM me if you need help.
Thanks for the feedback, I appreciate constructive criticism.
The gaps in the panels in a consequence of how I draw these profiles, I always draw the individual panels and I suspected from the beginning that they they may be a little large, I have begun to adjust them to overlap more closely to how they appear in reality. (see image below)
Re the rivets and panel fasteners, the way they appear in the initial image is more overstated then I intended for the final image, I prefer to keep them a little overstated as I work. and then drop them back toward completion.
Some of the image that I have used thus far, will post more later currently on peddle power as my Broadband is down.
That is very interesting. I have under construction a P-51D metal using exactly the same method. (http://www.dogfighters.net/phoenix-a...51projectl.jpg ) It kinda got out of hand with the metal and became hard to control all of the areas of construction. Takes up far too much time for me too, but it looks like you are making it work. I now use the "oils on canvas” technique which is layers and layers of colour and tone one on top of the other. This method can be just as troublesome to keep tidy, but it is one I am more used to handling.
Like I said before, your XIV is looking great and I am looking forward to seeing the finished profile.
Posts: 681
Thanks: 17
Thanked 13 Times in 12 Posts
Downloads: 5
Uploads: 2
Rep Power: 2
Re: Spitfire MK XIV e WIP
It's fascinating to see how everyone works on this forum. I'd never thought of breaking down the aircraft in different panels. I'd thought of smaller sections (wings, engines, etc...) but even that seemed too complicated to me.
I prefer to work in a more painterly manner when doing these profiles. Working this way can tend to get out of hand a little, but I prefer to put anything new on a separate layer no matter its size as it makes it easier to manipulate later, this can as was the case of the Thunderbolt that I posted earlier lead to having 400+ layers, but with a good work flow it becomes easier, I use a layer mask on each layer and organise layers into different folders for each part of the profile eg wing, fuse etc.
Im not sure how you guys do it, but it seems to work ok for me.
Getting bare metal to look right is the ultimate challenge for me, you seem to have a good understanding Jester, but I do enjoy a challenge, maybe if I ever finish the spitfire.
I have tightened up the panel lines as suggested and it does work a lot better.
will post a update when I get my Broadband back on-line.
Working this way just makes life easier if, as I do, prefer to have the option of having the canopy open or closed or the landing gear open or retracted, I can even adjust the angle of the flaps if I choose, its a lot of extra work, but I reckon its worth it.
Funny you should mention jets at 1000+ layers Supah. My latest project is still under the 100 layers mark and is quite close to being finished. Another week and I hope to stick a fork in it. Where as my 109G’s are all well over the 500 layers +.
Then again modern jets have more fiddly bits.
